![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I finally read "The Silkworm" by J. K. Rowling (well, by "Robert Galbraith," but...) and WHOA, my goodness, I'm so impressed! JKR is truly moving from strength to strength.
Back in the day, the good old Harry Potter day, my assessment of J. K. Rowling tended to be: unquestionable genius at world-building, plot and character; not always so deft in the not-clunky prose department.
Now, though? Wow. Her prose is smooth and lovely, her plotting swept me along with no exceptions, the conclusion to the mystery was masterfully done (and better than in "The Cuckoo's Calling," in fact) – in short, this is a very well-written novel from a very assured author. The work she's put into learning and working and constantly improving! I'm impressed and inspired. And very much looking forward to the next Cormoran Strike novel, whenever that may come.
Hats off, Ms. Rowling/Galbraith. Hats off.
. . . . .
A side note and a fun question to ponder: In poking around online to see if there's any word about Strike novel #3, I came across an article where JKR pointed out that it's really no surprise she's now writing mysteries, given that the Harry Potter books, despite technically being in the fantasy genre, are structured as mysteries. (Thank you, that's what I said all along!) Specifically, she described the HP books as "six whodunits and one why dun it."
...Which book do you think she's describing as a "why dun it"? "Half-Blood Prince," given that it centers on backstory more than a present-day mystery (though it does have the present-day mystery of Draco and the Vanishing Cabinet)? Or "Deathly Hallows," which does break from form in that it's not a mystery so much as an epic fantasy-style quest (but on the other hand, does it really have "why" elements in it)?
Back in the day, the good old Harry Potter day, my assessment of J. K. Rowling tended to be: unquestionable genius at world-building, plot and character; not always so deft in the not-clunky prose department.
Now, though? Wow. Her prose is smooth and lovely, her plotting swept me along with no exceptions, the conclusion to the mystery was masterfully done (and better than in "The Cuckoo's Calling," in fact) – in short, this is a very well-written novel from a very assured author. The work she's put into learning and working and constantly improving! I'm impressed and inspired. And very much looking forward to the next Cormoran Strike novel, whenever that may come.
Hats off, Ms. Rowling/Galbraith. Hats off.
. . . . .
A side note and a fun question to ponder: In poking around online to see if there's any word about Strike novel #3, I came across an article where JKR pointed out that it's really no surprise she's now writing mysteries, given that the Harry Potter books, despite technically being in the fantasy genre, are structured as mysteries. (Thank you, that's what I said all along!) Specifically, she described the HP books as "six whodunits and one why dun it."
...Which book do you think she's describing as a "why dun it"? "Half-Blood Prince," given that it centers on backstory more than a present-day mystery (though it does have the present-day mystery of Draco and the Vanishing Cabinet)? Or "Deathly Hallows," which does break from form in that it's not a mystery so much as an epic fantasy-style quest (but on the other hand, does it really have "why" elements in it)?
no subject
Date: 2015-02-14 09:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: